As well as causing finacial pressure on tenants, tenancy deposits are an admin nightmare for letting agents and landlords, with registration fees and late penalties charges costing thousands a year. With over £4billion tied up in schemes in the UK rather than benfitting the economy, it's about time there was a better way to secure property and make renting fairer.
Whether through a custodial or an insured deposit scheme, over £4billion of tenants' deposit money is still tied up and held by either the agent or the scheme operator, opening the door for corruption. This money could be used to cover tenant moving costs or at least allow tenants to make interest off it themselves. Luckily, these are no longer the only options available. Here's a quick overview of the current system and a look at how Reposit is making renting fairer.
Tenancy deposit schemes: the big three
Under the 2004 Housing Act, landlords/letting agents must protect deposits taken under one of three government approved deposit schemes: the Tenancy Deposit Scheme, Deposit Protection Service or MyDeposits. Most importantly, the deposit must be registered within 30 days or hefty fines apply. These schemes offer either a custodial option and/or an insured option.
The insured schemes allow the landlord/letting agent to keep the tenant's deposit in their own bank account throughout the tenancy. These schemes are popular, possible as the deposit can provide both interest over the course of the tenancy and cash relief for letting agents or landlords themselves whenever needed, which makes this type of scheme very risky. In the event of a dispute the money is transferred to the scheme until a resolution is found and then returned to the landlord/tenant according to the decision.
Insured schemes come with a joining fee and then extra costs for registering each individual deposit. With the onset of the tenant fees ban, these charges can no longer be passed onto tenants, so we expect to see insured deposit schemes becoming less popular.
With a custodial scheme the deposit is held by the scheme providers themselves, rather than the letting agent. At the end of the tenancy the scheme releases the deposit as long as the landlord and tenant are in agreement.
Custodial schemes are free, as the schemes themselves cover their costs from interest made off the tenants' deposits they hold.
What's the problem with using these schemes?
For property managers, the schemes are a paperwork nightmare and in the case of the insured scheme, carry costs which could easily be avoided. Aside from the fees, deposits are an old-fashioned way of letting property which come with a mountain of paperwork hassle and haven't kept up with the digital age. Further, the money tied up in the system could be put to much better use in the UK economy.
With all of these deposit scheme providers on both insured/custodial the tenant's money is tied up for the length of their tenancy allowing another business to make money off the interest. Additionally, 97% of deposits are paid back without dispute, proving tenants can generally be trusted to be responsible and treat a property like their own home.
Reposit: how and why is it different?
With Reposit the tenant pays one week's fee instead of up to six weeks' rent, so they save money and can often move in sooner. There's no need to worry about registering a deposit or any confusion about who should keep the money between the scheme and the agent.
Earn commission with Reposit
Most importantly, unlike the schemes, Reposit pays the landlord/letting agent commission for each tenancy. For a property with a £1000PCM rent, instead of paying a deposit of up to £1500 on top of rent and other moving costs, a tenant would pay a Reposit fee of only £230 and the property manager (landlord or agent) would receive £50.
Save time and money on referencing
Reposit also offers free tenant referencing and incentivises tenants to reduce their fee over time through good property care - if a tenant leaves a property with no charges outstanding their next Reposit fee will automatically go down along with the personal risk.